Rebecca Stark is the author of The Good Portion: Godthe second title in The Good Portion series.

The Good Portion: God explores what Scripture teaches about God in hopes that readers will see his perfection, worth, magnificence, and beauty as they study his triune nature, infinite attributes, and wondrous works. 

                     

Thursday
Aug162012

Reading Classics Together: The Discipline of Grace, Chapter 2

(I’m reading along with Tim Challies as he reads yet another Christian classic for his Reading Classics Together program.)

Once I heard a young seminary student say that he looked forward to the day when he could go a day, maybe two, without sinning. The remark surprised me. I’m not sure why he thought that someday he’d be sinless for short periods, but he did. Perhaps he hadn’t lived long enough to grasp the relentlessness of sin in our hearts. Maybe he had a limited view of sin. 

This week’s reading in The Discipline of Grace: God’s Role and Our Role in the Pursuit of Holiness by Jerry Bridges reminded me of this long-ago comment. The chapter starts with William Carey, courageous missionary to India, as an old man, lamenting his innumerable “direct and positive sins” and his great “negligence in the Lord’s work.” The future the young man envisioned didn’t come to pass for Carey, and anyone who’s lived long enough and is honestly self-reflective knows there’ll never be a time when they go a day, maybe two, without sinning.

Jerry Bridges says Christians tend to think one of two ways, and neither is quite right. Either they have a “relentless sense of guilt due to unmet expectations in living the Christian life,” or they are satisfied in some measure with their own performance as a Christian. If we think like the last group, we risk becoming like the self-righteous Pharisee who prayed “God, I thank you that I am not like other men” because he did not commit some of the more obvious sins he saw around him.

Like the Pharisee, we may think of sin as only the biggies—murder, lying, adultery, etc.—all the ones we don’t commit. But most often, writes Bridges,

our sin problem is in the area I call “refined” sins. These are the sins of nice people, sins that we can regularly commit and still retain our positions as elders, deacons, Sunday school teachers….

These are sins like having a critical spirit, gossiping, being impatient, irritable, unwilling to forgive, to list a few. These may be “refined” sins, but they are serious, for they acts of rebellion against God. And we can’t stop there: to the extent that we don’t exhibit the positive traits that God requires of us, we are sinning, too.

Believers are always, in this life, both saints and sinners: Saints in Christ; sinners in ourselves.

We really are new creations in Christ. A real, fundamental change has occurred in the depths of our beings. The Holy Spirit has come to dwell within us, and we have been freed from the dominion of sin. But despite this we still sin every day, many times a day. And in that sense we are sinners.

The older I get, the more I can admit to myself and to God how deep down my sinful bent goes. Even still, I know I’m not seeing even the half of it, maybe because I couldn’t endure the sight of the whole. I can admit more now because I understand the gospel better. In Christ, my sins—all of them—are forgiven, and better yet, Christ’s own righteousness is counted as mine. It’s knowing this last truth of imputed righteousness, by the way, that most helps me face my sin, as appalling as it is.

(Read Tim’s  summary of this chapter.)

Thursday
Aug162012

Thankful Thursday

I’m thankful that God is love. Out of his love, God saves sacrificially, giving up his own Son, and his sacrificial giving is done, not for those who are in some way giving back to him, or even neutral toward him, but for those who are rejecting him. God’s love is the kind of love that rescues the unlovely and unworthy at great cost. That’s mind-boggling love, infinite love, immeasurable love, love that is “great to the heavens,” and I’m so thankful for it. If God weren’t a loving God, I’d be in deep doo-doo.

That God loves me is my security; I can rest in his love. 

Who will separate us from the love of Christ? Will trouble, or distress, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or danger, or sword? As it is written, “For your sake we encounter death all day long; we were considered as sheep to be slaughtered.” No, in all these things we have complete victory through him who loved us! For I am convinced that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor heavenly rulers, nor things that are present, nor things to come, nor powers, nor height, nor depth, nor anything else in creation will be able to separate us from the love of God in Christ Jesus our Lord. (Romans 8:35-39)

If God did not spare the Son he loved because of his love for us, we know that his love is the sort of love we can count on to give us everything else that we need. God’s love for me has already cost him his own Son; he will not give up on me now. There is nothing—no person or power or circumstance—that can take God’s love from me. And that’s something to be thankful for.

I’m also thankful for God’s providential care, which also comes from his love. Here are a few of his providential gifts to me this week:

  • a chance meeting with someone who had sad new about an old friend that I needed to know and needed to know now.
  • garden vegies filling the crispers in the fridge. Along with those mentioned in previously, this week there are also raspberries, peas, and brocolli.
  • a few days of perfect summer weather. I feel like I can advance to fall with my summer weather needs satisfied.
  • visits from the babies. You may tire of reading about the babies every week, but I never tire of thanking God for them.
Wednesday
Aug152012

Round the Sphere Again: Complementarianism 

The complementarian/egalitarian debate is not my favorite subject. If I had my way, I’d completely avoid reading/talking/posting about it. But it’s an important issue and people keep bringing it up, so I’ve collected some worthwhile links for you.

For Listening
Last week I listened to this two-part interview with Dr. Jim Hamilton, a complementarian, in which he responds to the egalitarian arguments of Dr. Philip Payne (Theopologetics):

Each podcast is about an hour long, so it’s a big time commitment, but I promise you won’t be bored.

For Reading
Don Carson defends the use of the term complementarian (The Gospel Coalition Blog). I think I agree with him: We should leave the term patriarchy in the dust heap. 

Also at The Gospel Coalition Blog, Kathleen Nielson gives a few reasons we can’t ignore the complementarian/egalitarian debate.


Tell me what you think.

  1. Do you ever use the term patriarchy to describe the Biblical ideal for the church and the home? Do you think complementarianism is better? Why or why not?
  2. What priority do you put on the complementarian/egalitarian issue? How important is it to you? 
  3. Do you keep up with the debate? Do you know the arguments made on each side?