Theological Term of the Week

filioque
“Latin for “and from the Son, ” a term  referring to a clause inserted into the Nicence Creed to indicate that the Holy Spirit proceeds not from the Father only but also from the Son. The controversy that arose over this doctrinal point contributed to the split between the Eastern and Western churches in A. D. 1054.”1

• Text of the Nicene Creed with the filioque clause in italics: 

  We believe in one God,
        the Father almighty,
        maker of heaven and earth,
        of all things visible and invisible.

  And in one Lord Jesus Christ,
        the only Son of God,
        begotten from the Father before all ages,
             God from God,
             Light from Light,
             true God from true God,
        begotten, not made;
        of the same essence as the Father.
        Through him all things were made.
        For us and for our salvation
             he came down from heaven;
             he became incarnate by the Holy Spirit and the virgin Mary,
             and was made human.
             He was crucified for us under Pontius Pilate;
             he suffered and was buried.
             The third day he rose again, according to the Scriptures.
             He ascended to heaven
             and is seated at the right hand of the Father.
             He will come again with glory
             to judge the living and the dead.
             His kingdom will never end.

  And we believe in the Holy Spirit,
        the Lord, the giver of life.
        He proceeds from the Father [and the Son],
        and with the Father and the Son is worshiped and glorified.
        He spoke through the prophets.
        We believe in one holy catholic and apostolic church.
        We affirm one baptism for the forgiveness of sins.
        We look forward to the resurrection of the dead,
        and to life in the world to come. Amen.

• Scriptural evidence for the filioque clause:

Nevertheless, I tell you the truth: it is to your advantage that I go away, for if I do not go away, the Helper will not come to you. But if I go, I will send him to you (John 16:7 ESV)

• From Systematic Theology by Wayne Grudem:

In the light of John 15:26 and 16:7, where Jesus said that he would send the Holy Spirit into the world, it seems there could be no objection to such a statement if it referred to the Holy Spirit proceeding from the Father and the Son at a point in time (particularly at Pentecost). But this was a statement about the nature of the Trinity, and the phrase was understood to speak of the eternal relationship between the Holy Spirit and the Son, something Scripture never explicitly discusses.

…Is there a correct position on this question? The weight of evidence (slim though it is) seems clearly to favor the western church. In spite of the fact that John 15:26 says that the Spirit of truth “proceeds from the Father,” this does not deny that he proceeds also from the Son (just as John 14:26 says that the Fahter will send the Holy Spirit, but John 16:7 says that the Son will send the Holy Spirit). In fact, in the same sentence in John 15:26 Jesus speaks of the Holy Spirit as one “whom I shall send to you from the Father.” And if the Son together with the Father sends the Spirit into the world, by analogy it would seem appropriate to say that this reflects eternal ordering of their relationships. This is not something that we can clearly insist on based on any specific verse, but much of our understanding of the eternal relationships among the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit comes by analogy from what Scripture tells us about the way they relate to the creation in time.

Learn more:

1. GotQuestions.org: What is the filioque clause / controversy?
2. BELIEVE Religious Information Source: Filioque Controversy
3. James E. Kiefer: The Filioque Clause
4. John Starke: A Pastoral Case for the Filioque Clause
5. John S. Romanides: The Filioque

Related terms:

• the Nicene Creed

Filed under Creeds and Confessions.

1From Systematic Theology by Wayne Grudem.

Do you have a term you’d like to see featured here as a Theological Term of the Week? If you email it to me, I’ll seriously consider using it, giving you credit for the suggestion and linking back to your blog when I do.

Clicking on the Theological Term graphic at the top of this post will take you to a list of all the previous theological terms in alphabetical order.

Round the Sphere Again: Concerning Christ

In the Incarnation
A warning against “novel ideas” concerning the person of Christ.

Whenever the discussion turns to Christology and the Incarnation, people seem to crawl out of the woodwork and start shooting from the hip. This is one area of theology where orthodoxy is very meticulously defined and has been accepted by all major traditions without serious challenge since the fourth century. Why anyone would want to enter the fray with a “Well, I think this: [your novel idea here]” kind of argument is mystifying to me. 

The reason these issues were hashed out so carefully in the early church is that they are absolutely foundational. And it behooves us all to study historical theology and the major creeds on these matters before launching into speculation. 

(Phil Johnson at Pyromaniacs)

Here’s what might be the perfect example of the sort of DIY Christology that Phil Johnson warns about: Leslie Wiggins reports that a speaker at a Women of Faith conference she attended taught that “Jesus wasn’t onmipotent or omniscient.” You’d think that would shock those who were listening, but instead “8,000 women erupted in applause and high-pitched woo-hoos.” 

I wonder if the women attending weren’t familiar enough with the orthodox teaching on the nature of Christ to recognize unorthodoxy when they heard it. Or did they just not care?

In Eternity
Andy Nasselli answers this question: Does the Son submit to the Father eternally? (mp3). 

In Him
Kim Shay quotes Derek Thomas:

Even as mature Christians we need to remind ourselves continually of the basis of our acceptance - it is entirely because of what Christ has done for us. Thus, faith in Christ is not a one time event; we must live by faith each day.

(The Upward Call)

A Catechism for Girls and Boys

Part II: Questions about The Ten Commandments

45. Q. What does the second commandment teach us?
       A. To worship God in the right way, and to avoid idolatry.

(Click through to read scriptural proof.)

Click to read more ...