Reading Biographies: Spurgeon

I’m reading Arnold Dallimore’s Spurgeon along with Tim Challies and others. This week, we read chapters 12-14 of this biography of Charles Spurgeon. Chapter 12 told of the almhouses and orphanages run by Spurgeon and his church. Chapter 13 described the illnesses that both Spurgeon and his wife  Susannah suffered over the years. Chapter 14 focused on Susannah Spurgeon and her ministry work.

Most interesting to me was the description of the orphanage built by Spurgeon:

The orphanage was planned according to certain concepts Spurgeon had developed. It was not to be like the average institution for needy children, with the younsters quartered in a barracklike building, all dressed alike and made to feel they were objects of charity. It was to be several individual homes—the buildings joined together and forming a continuous row—each home to house fourteen boys and to be under the care of a matron who acted as a mother to the lads. There was to be discipline, education, and Christian instruction, with kindness and sport and individuality.

I visited an orphange when I was young, and it was nothing like this. I’m impressed that Spurgeon came up with such an innovative and thoughtful plan for caring for the children. What’s more, Spurgeon was generous with the children in other ways. They had a pool, and everyone learned to swim. Spurgeon knew almost all of them by name. When he visited, he carried pennies and gave each child one of them. It considered it especially important to visit any child who was sick in the infirmary.

What a picture of a man who loved—even needy children—as Christ loved!

Mrs. Spurgeon, too, showed the love of Christ to others. Her ministry was helping poor pastors and their families by sending books, clothing, blankets and money to them.

Now our governments take care of needy children and poor families, and churches (at least any I know) aren’t involved in this kind of service to people right around them to the same extent the Metropolitan Tabernacle was. I’m not sure that’s an unqualified good thing.

Thankful Thursday

I had a million things on my to-do list today, but I ended up spending almost the whole afternoon in the back yard

• soaking in the sun and fresh air
• playing with the dogs
• chatting with family, friends and neighbours.

I’m thankful that I can take an occasional unplanned day off when the weather is good and people pop by. I’m thankful for sun and fresh air and my pleasant back yard. I’m thankful for family, friends and neighbors. If I didn’t think another mention in a Thankful Thursday post might go to their heads, I’d say I was thankful for the dogs, too.

I’m thankful for a clothesline and good weather for drying clothes, so that my broken and still unrepaired (or unreplaced) dryer hasn’t stressed me at all…yet.

I’m thankful for an abundant—okay, overabundant—raspberries. (Do you want a pint or two?)

I’m thankful that all my circumstances are in the hands of my trustworthy God.

On Thursdays throughout this year, I plan to post a few thoughts of thanksgiving along with Kim at the Upward Call and others. Why don’t you participate by posting your thanksgiving each week, too? It’ll be an encouragement to you and to others, I promise.

Theological Term of the Week

exclusivism
The teaching that Jesus Christ is the only Saviour and faith in him is necessary for salvation.

• From scripture:

  That if you confess with your mouth, “Jesus is Lord,” and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved. For it is with your heart that you believe and are justified, and it is with your mouth that you confess and are saved. As the Scripture says, “Anyone who trusts in him will never be put to shame.” For there is no difference between Jew and Gentile—the same Lord is Lord of all and richly blesses all who call on him, for, “Everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved.” How, then, can they call on the one they have not believed in? And how can they believe in the one of whom they have not heard? And how can they hear without someone preaching to them? (Romans 10:9-14 ESV)

• From the Westminster Larger Catechism:

  Question 60: Can they who have never heard the gospel, and so know not Jesus Christ, nor believe in him, be saved by their living according to the light of nature?

  Answer: They who, having never heard the gospel, know not Jesus Christ, and believe not in him, cannot be saved, be they never so diligent to frame their lives according to the light of nature, or the laws of that religion which they profess; neither is there salvation in any other, but in Christ alone, who is the Savior only of his body the church.

• From Christian Exclusivism Explained and Defended by Matt Perman:

  Sometimes the question is phrased like this: “What happens to the innocent native in deepest Africa who never hears the gospel?” If one puts it this way, the answer is easy: the innocent person has nothing to worry about! As R.C. Sproul has said, “The innocent native who never hears of Christ is in excellent shape, and we need not be anxious about his redemption. The innocent person doesn’t need to hear of Christ. He has no need of redemption. God never punishes innocent people. The innocent person needs no Savior; he can save himself by his innocence” (Sproul, p. 49).
  
  The problem, however, is that there is no such thing as the innocent native in Africa, or anywhere! The Bible teaches that “all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God” (Romans 6:23) and “there is none righteous, not even one” (Romans 3:10). In fact, the Scriptures go so far as to say that left to ourselves, “there is none who seeks for God” (Romans 3:11).
  
  This leads us to an important principle: the person who has never heard of Christ is already condemned—not because they haven’t accepted a Savior they’ve never heard about, but because they have sinned against what they do know about God. But one may ask, “What has this native known about God that He could reject?” The answer is in the distinction the Bible makes between general revelation and special revelation. Special revelation is the message that Christ died and rose again for sins, and that salvation comes through trusting in Him. This message is only revealed in the Bible, and therefore the only people who get special revelation are those who either hear it from others or read it for themselves. General revelation is “the mute non-verbal witness of the creation that points men to the existence of God” (Robert Morey, Studies in the Atonement, p. 246). Since general revelation is given through nature, all humans are aware of it. The Bible teaches that everyone, through the general revelation of nature, knows that God the Father exists and is holy (Romans 1:18-21) and that they are sinful (Romans 1:32; 2:14-15) and thus are deserving of death (Romans 1:32). Therefore, all humans to ever live, whether they have heard of Christ or not, are guilty and without excuse before God for rejecting what they do know about God (Romans 1:20, 21; 3:23).
  
  This should clear up a huge misunderstanding. Often we think that humanity is in the neutral zone, and that “the only damnable offense against God is the rejection of Christ” (Sproul, p. 50). Thus, it would seem unfair for God to condemn those who have never heard, because they never had the chance to respond to the gospel and commit the “damnable offense” of rejecting Christ. However, we have seen that the Scriptures are clear that we are not neutral, and even those who do not have the Bible are willingly and knowingly guilty of sin and rejecting God. We are sinners by nature (Eph 2:3) and by choice (Romans 6:23) even if we have never heard of Christ (Romans 1:18-32), and thus we are all deserving of condemnation. That is why we need Christ. “For God did not send the Son into the world to judge the world, but that the world should be saved through Him” (John 3:17). So the gospel is sent to save those who are already condemned for reasons independent of the message, not to condemn those who are neutral in the sight of God but are in danger of perishing if they are never exposed to special revelation.
  
  Therefore, “We can rest assured that no one is ever punished for rejecting Christ if they’ve never heard of Him” (Sproul, p. 50). Those who never hear are condemned because they have rejected the general revelation of God the Father in nature that all people without exception receive, not because they have never heard of Christ. Those who never hear are not under condemnation for not knowing about special revelation that they never received, but for rejecting general revelation that they did receive.

Learn more:

1. GotQuestions.org: Inclusivism vs. exclusivism - what does the Bible say?
2. GotQuestions.org: Can a person be saved through general revelation?
3. W. Gary Crampton: Christian Exclusivism
4. J. I. Packer: Salvation sans Jesus
5. John Hendryx: Is Jesus Really the Only Way?
6. Matt Perman: Christian Exclusivism Explained and Defended 
7. Curt Daniel: The Destiny of the Unevangelized (mp3)
8. Kevin DeYoung: Clarifying Inclusivism and Exclusivism

Related terms:

• general revelation
• inclusivism
• universalism
• pluralism
  

Filed under Isms.

Do you have a a theological term you’d like to see featured here as a Theological Term of the Week? If you email it to me, I’ll seriously consider using it.

I’m also interested in any suggestions you have for tweaking my definitions or for additional (or better) articles or sermons/lectures for linking. I’ll give you credit and a link back to your blog if I use your suggestion.

Clicking on the Theological Term graphic at the top of this post will take you to a list of all the previous theological terms organized in alphabetical order or by topic.