Rebecca Stark is the author of The Good Portion: Godthe second title in The Good Portion series.

The Good Portion: God explores what Scripture teaches about God in hopes that readers will see his perfection, worth, magnificence, and beauty as they study his triune nature, infinite attributes, and wondrous works. 

                     

Wednesday
Jun232010

Theological Term of the Week

presuppositional apologetics
An approach to apologetics that starts with the foundational axioms of the existence of God and his divine revelation to us in Scripture, and seeks to show that the Christian faith built on these presuppositions makes sense of life and reality and that any other belief system built on other foundational axioms does not. Also called presuppositionalism or biblical apologetics.

  • From scripture:

    So Paul, standing in the midst of the Areopagus, said: “Men of Athens, I perceive that in every way you are very religious. 23 For as I passed along and observed the objects of your worship, I found also an altar with this inscription, ‘To the unknown god.’ What therefore you worship as unknown, this I proclaim to you. 24 The God who made the world and everything in it, being Lord of heaven and earth, does not live in temples made by man,  25 nor is he served by human hands, as though he needed anything, since he himself gives to all mankind life and breath and everything. 26 And he made from one man every nation of mankind to live on all the face of the earth, having determined allotted periods and the boundaries of their dwelling place, 27 that they should seek God, in the hope that they might feel their way toward him and find him. Yet he is actually not far from each one of us, 28 for

    “‘In him we live and move and have our being’; 

    as even some of your own poets have said,

    “‘For we are indeed his offspring.’ 

    29 Being then God’s offspring, we ought not to think that the divine being is like gold or silver or stone, an image formed by the art and imagination of man. 30 The times of ignorance God overlooked, but now he commands all people everywhere to repent, 31 because he has fixed a day on which he will judge the world in righteousness by a man whom he has appointed; and of this he has given assurance to all by raising him from the dead.” (Acts 17:22-31 ESV)

  • From The Westminster Confession of Faith, Chapter 1:
    Of The Holy Scripture

    IV. The authority of the Holy Scripture, for which it ought to be believed, and obeyed, depends not upon the testimony of any man, or Church; but wholly upon God (who is truth itself) the author thereof: and therefore it is to be received, because it is the Word of God.[9]

  • From Defending the Faith: An Introduction to Presuppositional Appologetics by Massimo Lorenzini:

    There are traditionally three approaches to faith and reason:

    • The rationalistic apologetic: Thomas Aquinas, “I believe because I understand.”
    • The irrational, fideistic apologetic: Tertullian, “I believe what is absurd.”
    • The presuppositional apologetic: Augustine, “I believe; therefore, I understand.”
    Contrary to rationalism, human reason is not a religiously neutral or independent realm that is philosophically prior to faith. Contrary to irrationalism, human reason need not be a futile and impossible task that is contrary to true faith. Consistent with presuppositionalism, the realm of true faith encompasses all and is prior to all, including logic and science, and only in the context of faith is a rational and orderly world possible.

Learn more:

  1. Wikipedia: Presuppositional Apologetics
  2. GotQuestions.org: What Is Presuppositional Apologetics?
  3. Dr. Brian M. Abshire: Reason, Evidence, and Presuppositional Apologetics
  4. S. Joel Garver: A Primer on Presuppositionalism
  5. Fred ButlerApologetic Methodology in a Nutshell and God Fearing Apologetics
  6. Fred Butler: Starting Points with Evidence
  7. Dr. Greg Bahnson: Presuppositional Procedure
  8. Dr. Greg Bahnson: Van Tillian Apologetics (4 mp3s)
  9. Westminster Theological Seminary: Apologetics Course on iTunes.
  10. Dr. Scott Oliphant: Apologetics and Doctrine of Scripture, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3 (YouTube videos)

Related terms:

Do you have a a theological term you’d like to see featured here as a Theological Term of the Week? If you email it to me, I’ll seriously consider using it.

I’m also interested in any suggestions you have for tweaking my definitions or for additional (or better) articles or sermons/lectures for linking. I’ll give you credit and a link back to your blog if I use your suggestion.

Clicking on the Theological Term graphic at the top of this post will take you to a list of all the previous theological terms organized in alphabetical order or by topic.

Tuesday
Jun222010

Round the Sphere Again: All Fun and Games

 

Name that Nick
Another of those mental_floss quizzes that I love so much.

Lighten Up
What color is Empire State Building right now? The lights, as you probably know, change for the occasion: red, white and blue for Flag Day and Independence Day, red and white for Canada Day. Tonight, they’re just plain white for nothing in particular.

You Say Fruit; I Say Vegetable
And we’re both right. Although I do have the Supreme Court on my side. (mental_floss Blog)

Game Plan
Theoretically, this is the shortest possible game of monopoly. Or so they say. Go ahead and watch; the game takes only 21 seconds of your time.

Tuesday
Jun222010

Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy 20

What do Christians mean when they say the Bible is inerrant? The Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy tells us what leading inerrantist mean by inerrancy. I’ll be posting a section of this statement each week until I’ve posted the whole thing.

You can read previously posted sections of this statement in by clicking here. After a preface and a short statement, the Chicago Statement contains a section called Articles of Affirmation and Denial.


Article XVIII.

We affirm that the text of Scripture is to be interpreted by grammatico-historical exegesis, taking account of its literary forms and devices, and that Scripture is to interpret Scripture.

We deny the legitimacy of any treatment of the text or quest for sources lying behind it that leads to relativizing, dehistoricizing, or discounting its teaching, or rejecting its claims to authorship.