Rebecca Stark is the author of The Good Portion: Godthe second title in The Good Portion series.

The Good Portion: God explores what Scripture teaches about God in hopes that readers will see his perfection, worth, magnificence, and beauty as they study his triune nature, infinite attributes, and wondrous works. 

                     

« Selected Reading, January 16, 2021 | Main | Sunday's Hymn: We Praise Thee, O God, Our Redeemer, Creator »
Thursday
Jan142021

Theological Term of the Week: Supralapsarianism

supralapsarianism
The theological position that in the plan made by God in eternity, his decree of election was logically prior to his decree to create and permit the fall; or to put it another way, the position that in eternity past, when God chose some people to save, he contemplated them as not yet created and fallen.

  • Scripture used to support supralapsarianism:

    For the Scripture says to Pharaoh, “For this very purpose I have raised you up, that I might show my power in you, and that my name might be proclaimed in all the earth.”

    You will say to me then, “Why does he still find fault? For who can resist his will?” But who are you, O man, to answer back to God? Will what is molded say to its molder, “Why have you made me like this?” Has the potter no right over the clay, to make out of the same lump one vessel for honorable use and another for dishonorable use? (Romans 9:17, 19-21 ESV)

  • From Systematic Theology by Robert Letham:
    The lapsarian debate concerns the order of decrees in the mind of God in eternity. It is not a question of the relation of election to its historical outworking… . The question relates to whether, in election, God contemplated humans as already fallen, which was the infralapsarian claim … or whether he considered them as not yet created and fallen.
    In many ways, this is a highly abtruse question. The inner workings of the mind of God are beyond us. However, it indicates ultimate priorities in God’s plan and has quite extensive ramifications. 
    Some are so zealous for particularism that they place discrimination at the root of all God’s dealings with his creatures. That he has any creatures at all they suppose to be in the interest of discrimination, and all that he decrees concerning his creatures they suppose he decrees only that he may discriminate between them. They therefore place the decree of “election” by which men are made to differ, in the order of decrees, logically prior to the decree of creation itself, or at any rate prior to all that is decreed concerning man as man; that is to say, since man’s history begins with the fall, prior to the decree of the fall itself. They are therefore called Supralapsarians, that is, those who place the decree of election in the order of thought prior to the decree of the fall.

 

Learn more:

  1. Kevin DeYoung: Theological Primer: Supralapsarianism and Infralapsarianism
  2. Monergism.com: What do the terms “supralapsarianism,” and “infralapsarianism” mean…? 
  3. Loraine BoettnerInfralapsarianism and Supralapsarianism
  4. Louis Berkhof: Supra- and Infralapsarianism 
  5. Herman BavinckSupralapsarianism and Infralapsarianism
  6. Curt DanielThe Order of the Decrees (mp3) from The History and Theology of Calvinism

 

Related terms: 

Filed under Reformed Theology


Do you have a a theological term you’d like to see featured as a Theological Term of the Week? Email your suggestion using the contact button in the navigation bar above. 

Clicking on the Theological Terms button will take you to an alphabetical list of all the theological terms.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend